Before you can write about a story or novel, you
must first understand the author's point. This is
sometimes hard because fiction is generally very
complex and usually includes several points or
themes. To discover these interwoven meanings, you
must read the work closely. Below are three
techniques for reading fiction actively and
critically. Close reading takes more time than quick,
superficial reading, but doing a close reading will
save you from a lot of frustration and anxiety when
you begin to develop your thesis.
CLOSE READING TECHNIQUES
1. Use these "tracking" methods to
yield a richer understanding of the text and lay a
solid ground work for your thesis.
- Use a highlighter, but only after you've read
for comprehension. The point of highlighting
at this stage is to note key passages,
phrases, turning points in the story.
PITFALLS:
- Highlighting too much
- Highlighting without notes in the margins
2. Write marginal notes in the text.
- These should be questions, comments, dialogue
with the text itself. A paragraph from Doris
Lessing's short story "A Woman on a
Roof" serves as an example:
Then they
saw her, between chimneys, about fifty yards
away. She lay face down on a brown blanket.
They could see the top part of her: black
hair, a flushed solid back, arms spread out.
"She's stark naked," said
Stanley, sounding annoyed.
The second paragraph could have a note from the
reader like this:
Why is the man annoyed by the sunbather? Is Lessing commenting on sexist attitudes?
3. Keep a notebook for freewrite summaries and
response entries.
- Write quickly after your reading: ask
questions, attempt answers and make comments
about whatever catches your attention. A good
question to begin with when writing response
entries is "What point does the author
seem to be making?"
STEPPING BACK. After close reading and
annotating, can you now make a statement about the
story's meaning? Is the author commenting on a
certain type of person or situation? What is that
comment?
IF YOU STILL DON'T KNOW:
Go to Part 2, #2 and try the approach outlined
there.
PlTFALLS:
- choosing too many ideas.
- choosing an idea without any support.
Some terms that will help you:
A lot of literary terms describe how an
author communicates his/her ideas. Look through the
text and try to identify some of methods he/she
conveys the patterns of ideas you are most interested
in. The following terms will help you express the
methods you see:
- characterization: the author's
expression of a character's personality
through the use of action, dialogue, thought,
or commentary by the author or another
character.
- conflict: the struggle within the
story. Character divided against self,
character against character, character
against society, character against nature,
character against God. Without it, there is
no story.
- dialogue: vocal exchange between two
or more characters. One of the ways in which
plot, character, action, etc. is developed.
- imagery: the collection of images
within a literary work. Used to evoke
atmosphere, mood, tension. For example,
images of crowded, steaming sidewalks
flanking streets choked with lines of
shimmering, smoking cars suggests oppressive
heat and all the psychological tensions that
go with it.
- point of view: the vantage point from
which the author presents action of the
story. Who is telling the story? An
all-knowing author? A voice limited to the
views of one character? The voice and
thoughts of one character? Does the author
change point of view in the story? Why? Point
of view is often considered the technical
aspect of fiction which leads the critic most
readily into the problems and meanings of the
story.
- symbol: related to imagery. It is
something which is itself yet stands for or
means something else. It tends to be more
singular, a bit more fixed than imagery. For
example, in Lessing's "A Woman on a
Roof," the brief red sun suit seems to
symbolize the woman's freedom and
independence from externally imposed
standards of behavior.
- tone: suggests an attitude toward the
subject which is communicated by the words
the author chooses. Part of the range of tone
includes playful, somber, serious, casual,
formal, ironic. Important because it
designates the mood and effect of a work.
PITFALL:
- Spending too much time on devices that don't
communicate the idea you want to focus on in
your paper.
Once you have some general points to focus on,
write your possible ideas and answer them.
For example:
Question: How does Conrad develop the idea
that all classes of society are corrupt?
Answer: He uses images of beasts and
cannibalism whether he's describing socialites,
policemen or secret agents.
To write your thesis statement, all you have to
do is turn the question and answer around. You've
already given the answer, now just put it in a
sentence (or a couple of sentences) so that the
thesis of your paper is clear.
Here's a good example:
In his novel, The Secret Agent, Conrad
uses beast and cannibal imagery to describe the
characters and their relationships to each other.
This pattern of images suggests that Conrad saw
corruption in every level of early twentieth
century London society.
Now that you're familiar with the story or novel
and have developed a thesis statement, you're ready
to choose the evidence you'll use to support your
thesis. There are a lot of good ways to do this, but
all of them depend on a strong thesis for their
direction.
Here's a student's thesis about Joseph Conrad's
The Secret Agent:
In his novel, The Secret Agent, Conrad
uses beast and cannibal imagery to describe the
characters and their relationships to each other.
This pattern of images suggests that Conrad saw
corruption in every level of early twentieth
century London society.
This thesis focuses on the idea of social
corruption and the device of imagery. To support this
thesis, you would need to find images of beasts and
cannibalism within the text.
Here are a few steps to a solid paper:
1. Freewrite.
Without referring to the text or your notes, write
for five or ten minutes on all the images (or device
you have chosen to examine) you can recall. This will
provide an initial "list" which will make
up your body of evidence.
2. Review.
Look back through the text and your notes to
further identify evidence, keeping focused on the
particular device you want to discuss.
3. Research.
(Optional: Ask your instructor about outside
sources before you use them.) Once you've identified
enough textual evidence to support your thesis, you
may want to see what other writers have had to say
about your topic. This kind of appeal to other
authorities helps you back up and interpret your
reading of the work.
Hint: Don't go to the critics before you've
developed a thesis and identified a solid body of
evidence. If you read them too soon, you may
permanently short-circuit your own ideas.
4. Evaluation.
You will probably generate more evidence than you
can use. One way to decide which evidence to take and
which to leave is to limit your choices to the best,
most illustrative examples you can find. Focus on how
the devices are used to develop major characters,
major scenes, and major turning points in the work.
You've read and annotated the work, developed a
thesis, and identified your evidence. Now you're
ready to work your evidence into your draft. Here are
three techniques on how and where to insert textual
and secondary evidence into your paper.
5. Quoting.
This is taking a word, phrase or passage directly
from the story, novel, or critical essay and working
it grammatically into your discussion. Here's an
example:
In his novel, The Secret Agent, Conrad
describes Verloc as "undemonstrative and
burly in a fat-pig style.... "(69) The pig
image suggests that Verloc is not a lean, zealous
anarchist, but is actually a corrupt, complacent
middle class man who is interested in preserving
his comfortable status.
Notice three things about the example above:
1) The passage from the novel is enclosed in
quotes and the page number is indicated in
parentheses.
2) The passage is introduced in a coherent
grammatical style; it reads like a complete, correct
sentence.
3) The quote is interpreted, not patched on and
left for the reader to figure out what it means.
WHEN TO USE A QUOTE:
1. to make a particularly important point
2. when a passage or point is particularly well
written
3. to include a particularly authoritative source
PITFALL:
- If you've used end-to-end quotes, you have
made a mistake. All quotes must be
introduced,discussed, and woven into the
text. A good rule of thumb: Don't let your
quotes exceed 25% of your text.
PARAPHRASING.
This is using your own words to say what the
author said. To paraphrase the quote used above, you
might say something like:
Conrad describes Verloc as a big man who isn't
very expressive and who looks like a pig.
When to paraphrase:
Paraphrasing is useful in general discussion
(introduction or conclusion) or when the author's
original style is hard to understand.
Again, you would need to interpret the paraphrase
just as you would a quote.
SUMMARIZING.
This is taking larger passages from the original
work and summing them up in a sentence or two. To use
the example above: Conrad uses pig imagery to
describe Verloc's character.
When to use a summary:
Like paraphrasing, summary is useful in general
discussion which leads up to a specific point and
when you want to introduce the work and present the
thesis.
PITFALLS TO AVOID These four common
assumptions about writing about fiction interfere
with rather than help the writer. Learn to avoid
them!
1. Plot Summary Syndrome:
- Assumes that the main task is simply
recalling what happened in detail. Plot
summary is just one of the requirements of
writing about fiction, not the intended goal.
2. Right Answer Roulette:
- Assumes that writing about fiction is a
"no win" game in which the student
writer is forced to try to guess the RIGHT
ANSWER that only the professor knows.
3. The "Everything is Subjective"
Shuffle:
- Assumes that ANY interpretation of any
literary piece is purely whimsy or personal
taste. Ignores the necessity of testing each
part of an Interpretation against the whole
text, as well as the need to validate each
idea by reference to specifics from the text
or quotation and discussion from the text.
4. The "How Can You Write 500 Words About
One Short Story?" Blues:
- Assumes that writing the paper is only a way
of stating the Answer rather than an
opportunity to explore an idea or explain
what your own ideas are and why you have
them. This sometimes leads to
"padding," repeating the same idea
in different words or worse, indiscriminate
"expert" quoting: using too many
quotes or quotes that are too long with
little or no discussion.
Copyright (C)1998 by Purdue University. All rights
reserved.